In keeping with a cost-benefit evaluation by Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and impartial researcher Kathy Dopp, the COVID jab is deadlier than COVID-19 itself for anybody below the age of 80. The price-benefit evaluation1 checked out publicly obtainable official knowledge from the U.S. and U.Ok. for all age teams, and in contrast all-cause mortality to the chance of dying from COVID-19.
“All age teams below 50 years outdated are at larger danger of fatality after receiving a COVID-19 inoculation than an unvaccinated individual is vulnerable to a COVID-19 demise,” Seneff and Dopp conclude. For youthful adults and kids, there’s no profit, solely danger.
“This evaluation is conservative,” the authors word, “as a result of it ignores the truth that inoculation-induced antagonistic occasions resembling thrombosis, myocarditis, Bell’s palsy, and different vaccine-induced accidents can result in shortened life span.
When one takes into consideration the truth that there may be roughly a 90% lower in danger of COVID-19 demise if early remedy is offered to all symptomatic high-risk individuals, one can solely conclude that mandates of COVID-19 inoculations are ill-advised.
Contemplating the emergence of antibody-resistant variants like Delta and Omicron, for many age teams COVID-19 vaccine inoculations lead to greater demise charges than COVID-19 does for the unvaccinated.”
Actual-Life Danger Discount Is Negligible
The evaluation can be conservative within the sense that it solely considers COVID jab fatalities that happen inside one month of injection. Wanting on the U.S. Vaccine Antagonistic Occasions Reporting System (VAERS), we’re now seeing that lots of those that are dying obtained the jab round April 2021 or earlier, so we all know the photographs can considerably reduce your life brief even when they don’t kill you within the first month. As detailed in Seneff’s and Dopp’s paper:
“Absolute real-life danger reductions (ARRs) … from COVID inoculations differ from a low of unfavourable 0.00007% (an elevated danger of a COVID demise from inoculation) for youngsters below age 18 to a optimistic 0.183% (0.00183) danger discount of a COVID demise for individuals over age 80 …
COVID vaccine inoculations enhance danger of demise and produce a internet unfavourable profit, aka elevated danger of demise … for all age teams youthful than 60 years outdated. In different phrases, the COVID inoculations trigger a internet enhance, reasonably than lower, within the probability of demise for all individuals below 60 years outdated.
For these over 60 years outdated, the advantage of COVID inoculations is negligible, starting from a 0.0016% discount in probability of demise for a 60- to 69-year-old individuals to a 0.125% discount in probability of demise for these over 80 years outdated. As a result of preventative therapies are sometimes given to properly individuals, a vaccine is meant to supply very small danger in comparison with profit.
Thus, such excessive fatality dangers (VFRs) versus low good thing about danger discount (ARRs) from the COVID inoculations aren’t acceptable, particularly contemplating that low-cost, efficient therapies can be found that may moreover scale back COVID-19 demise charges by as a lot as 90% or extra if offered as quickly as signs seem in high-risk individuals.”
In the meantime, knowledge from an evaluation2 by researchers Spiro Pantazatos and Herve Seligmann recommend U.S. deaths reported to VAERS are underreported by an element of 20. Their evaluation was used to calculate vaccine fatality charges (VFR), the quantity wanted to deal with/vaccinate (NNT) to stop one COVID demise, the anticipated variety of vaccine fatalities to stop one COVID demise, and the anticipated variety of vaccine fatalities in comparison with COVID fatalities by age group:3
|Age group||VFR — Vaccine fatality charge||NNT to stop one COVID demise||Anticipated vaccine fatalities to stop one COVID demise||Anticipated variety of vaccine fatalities in comparison with COVID fatalities|
|Below 18||0.004%||Vaccine causes greater COVID demise charge||Vaccine causes greater COVID demise charge||51|
|18 to 29||0.005%||318,497||16||8|
|30 to 39||0.009%||164,538||15||7|
|40 to 49||0.017%||55,516||9||5|
|50 to 59||0.016%||11,760||2||1|
|60 to 69||0.026%||3,624||1||1|
|70 to 79||0.048%||1,300||1||0|
|80 to 89||0.057%||547||0||0|
In abstract, key findings on this paper embrace the next:
- For these below 18, the COVID jab will increase their danger of dying from COVID-19; these below 18 are 51 occasions extra more likely to die from the jab than they’re to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
- In these aged 18 to 29, the COVID jab is 16 occasions extra more likely to kill an individual than save their life in the event that they get COVID. They’re additionally eight occasions extra more likely to die from the jab than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
- These aged 30 to 39 are 15 occasions extra more likely to die from the COVID jab than stop their demise, and so they’re seven occasions extra more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
- These aged 40 to 49 are 9 occasions extra more likely to die from the COVID jab than having it stop their demise, and so they’re 5 occasions extra more likely to die from the jab than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
- These aged 50 to 59 are twice (2 occasions) extra more likely to die from the COVID inoculation than to stop one COVID demise, whereas their danger of dying from the jab or dying from COVID if unvaccinated is about the identical.
Solely if you get into the 60 and older classes do the dangers between the jab and COVID an infection even out. Within the 60 to 69 age group, the shot will kill one individual for each individual it saves from dying of COVID, so it’s a tossup as as to whether it could be price it for any given individual.
Value-Profit Evaluation Should Drive Public Well being Coverage
Frequent sense tells us that COVID-19 vaccination coverage should be rooted in a rational analysis of the true prices and advantages, and to do this, we have to assess whether or not the jabs are helpful or dangerous, and to what extent. To this point, governments have utterly ignored the price of this mass injection marketing campaign, focusing solely on perceived or imagined (not confirmed) profit.
Consequently, we’re trying on the worst public well being catastrophe in recognized historical past. The best tragedy of all is that none of our public well being officers has bothered to guard even the youngest amongst us.
The OpenVAERS staff not too long ago began taking a look at damage experiences in kids aged 17 and youthful, and to their shock, they discovered 34,223 U.S. experiences involving this age group by means of February 11, 2022. You will discover the Child’s Report here.4 This can be a staggering quantity, contemplating the 12- to 17-year-olds have solely been eligible for the shot since Might 2021, and 5- to 11-year-olds since October 2021.5
Pfizer Withdraws EUA Software for Youngsters Below 5
Apparently, February 11, 2022, Pfizer abruptly withdrew its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) utility for youngsters below 5.6,7 The query is why? In keeping with the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and Pfizer, they wish to accumulate extra knowledge on the results of a 3rd dose, as two doses didn’t produce anticipated immunity in 2- to 5-year-olds.8
Three days later, former FDA Commissioner and present Pfizer board member Dr. Scott Gottlieb advised CNBC9 the EUA utility was pulled as a result of COVID circumstances are so low amongst younger kids that the shot couldn’t be proven to supply a lot of a profit.
However in accordance in an e mail discover to subscribers, OpenVAERS acknowledged, “None of those explanations suffice as a result of all of that info was recognized previous to Pfizer submitting this EUA to the FDA on February 1 . It makes one wonder if antagonistic occasions within the remedy group could be the issue that neither Pfizer nor the FDA wish to speak about?”
These Who Ought to Be within the Know Don’t Know a Factor
In associated information, Jessica Rose, Ph.D., a analysis fellow on the Institute for Pure and Utilized Data in Israel, highlighted a February 5, 2022, Freedom of Data Request despatched to the Therapeutic Items Administration (TGA), the Australian equal of the FDA.10 The inquiry requested for paperwork referring to the TGA’s evaluation of:
- The presence and danger of micro-RNA sequences inside the Comirnaty mRNA lively ingredient (the mRNA genomic sequence)
- The presence and danger of oncomirs (cancer-causing micro-RNA) in Comirnaty
- The presence and danger of cease codon read-through (suppression of codon exercise) arising because of the usage of pseudouridine in Comirnaty
- The composition of the ultimate protein product (molecular weight and amino acid sequence) produced following injection of the Comirnaty mRNA product in human topics
- The chance of the usage of AES-mtRNR1 3’ untranslated area of the Comirnaty mRNA product in human topics
Because it seems, the TGA has none of those paperwork, as a result of they’ve not assessed any of those dangers. Why does this matter? Properly, as defined by Rose:
“Micro-RNA (miRNAs) are small (20-22 nucleotides) single-stranded non-coding RNA molecules that operate to interrupt or suppress gene expression at transcriptional or translational ranges to manage gene expression.”
Contemplating micro-RNA can alter gene expression, wouldn’t we wish to know if micro-RNAs are current within the shot, contemplating we’re injecting lots of of thousands and thousands of individuals, together with youngsters and kids? The identical goes for oncomirs, the suppression of codon exercise, protein merchandise and the remainder.
“Stephanie Seneff has warned11 of two miRNAs that disrupt the type-1 interferon response in any cell, together with immune cells: miR-148a and miR-590,” Rose continues.
“I don’t know what potential connections there are right here but, however it’s protected to say that any tech that includes the introduction of international mRNA to be mass-produced by human cells have to be totally security examined.
The truth that none of those paperwork ‘exist’ is proof optimistic that they both do not know what the potential results of what they made are as a result of they did no bench work/investigations/research, or, that they know and are hiding the outcomes. Both alternative is past prison.”
The Essential Design Flaw
In an August 2021 Substack article,12 British cybersecurity researcher Ehden Biber homed in on the potential dangers of utilizing pseudouridine to optimize the codon.
The COVID photographs don’t include the equivalent mRNA discovered within the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The mRNA has been genetically manipulated in a course of referred to as “codon optimization,” and this course of is definitely recognized to create surprising and detrimental negative effects.
“How come Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen and many others. are utilizing a know-how that each they and the regulators know will trigger unknown outcomes?” Biber requested. The explanation codon optimization was used is as a result of it’s fairly troublesome to get your physique to supply a given protein by injecting mRNA.
It’s a gradual and customarily inefficient course of. To ensure that the injection to work, they want greater ranges of protein expression than is of course doable. Scientists bypass this downside by making substitutions within the genetic directions. They’ve found which you can swap out sure nucleotides (three nucleotides make up a codon) and nonetheless find yourself with the identical protein in the long run. However the elevated effectivity comes at a horrible value.
When substituting components of the code on this method, the ensuing protein can simply get misfolded, and this has been linked to a wide range of continual ailments,13 together with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s illness and coronary heart failure.14 As defined by Biber:15
“Seems the protein which was manufactured when codon optimization has other ways it folds and a unique 3D form, and it ‘might trigger immunogenicity, for instance, which wouldn’t be seen till late-stage scientific trials and even after approval.’ This assertion pertains to the NORMAL approval cycle. The COVID vaccines went by way of an accelerated one.”
Now, the FDA has been totally conscious of those issues since 2011, when Chava Kimchi Sarfaty, Ph.D., a principal investigator on the FDA, acknowledged that “We don’t imagine which you can optimize codons and have the protein behave because it did in its native type.”
She went on to warn, “The modified type might trigger immunogenicity, for instance, which wouldn’t be seen till late-stage scientific trials and even after approval.”16
If the FDA knew all this again in 2011, why have they not raised objections towards codon optimization getting used within the making of the COVID jabs? The identical query must be requested of the Australian TGA.
The FOIA requester was possible considering of the March 2021 paper, “BNT162b2 Vaccine: Potential Codons Misreading, Errors in Protein Synthesis and Different Splicing Anomalies”17 once they put collectively that inquiry, as a result of that paper highlights Pfizer’s in depth codon optimization utilizing pseudouridine, which has recognized antagonistic results, in addition to the usage of 3’-UTR sequence, the implications of that are nonetheless unknown.
The truth that the TGA has no knowledge on the dangers of those modifications simply goes to point out that they, just like the U.S. FDA, aren’t truly working to make sure these jabs are protected. They’re defending the earnings of the drug firms.
Pfizer even admits, in its BNT162b2/Comirnaty Danger Administration Plan submitted to the FDA to get EUA, that the codon optimization they did resulted in elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT),18 which is an early marker of coronary heart failure. Elevated GGT can be an indicator of insulin resistance, cardiometabolic illness,19 liver illness20 and continual kidney illness.21
That alone ought to have raised some questions, have been the FDA truly searching for public well being. All in all, there’s extra motive than ever to query the COVID jab mandates and the usage of these photographs in kids.