As Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau pulled out all of the stops to quash the trucker protest in opposition to vaccine mandates, with out ever having truly listened to their complaints, a reality emerged, clear as day. Democracy has been an phantasm. That is the conclusion drawn by Canadian journalist Matthew Ehret in a February 18, 2022, Strategic Tradition article.1

“Who would have thought that Canada would ever be a spark plug for a freedom motion in opposition to tyranny?” Ehret asks.

“Numerous hundreds of patriots have pushed throughout the nation to bunker down in Ottawa in peace and excessive festive spirits which I needed to see with my very own eyes to consider demanding one thing so easy and un-tainted by ideology: freedom to work, present for households and a respect for fundamental rights as specified by the Constitution of Rights and Freedoms …

Mainstream media and political hacks have been working time beyond regulation to color the Freedom convoy that converged on Ottawa on January 29 as an ‘insurrectionist motion’ filled with ‘white supremacists,’ ‘Russian stooges,’ and ‘Nazis’ out to ‘overthrow the federal government.’

Even the Financial institution of England’s former governor (and World Financial Discussion board Trustee) Mark Carney chimed in on February 7 stating that ‘that is sedition’ and that ‘those that are nonetheless serving to to increase this occupation should be recognized and punished to the complete drive of the legislation’ …

Confronted with an natural civil rights motion of blue-collar truckers, farmers and tens of hundreds of supporters who’ve convened on Canada’s capital to demand a restoration of their fundamental freedoms, the present Liberal authorities has failed to indicate even an oz of humanity or capability to barter.

This should not be a shock for individuals who have seen the hypocrisy of neo-liberal ‘rules-based’ order ideologues in motion over the previous few years who’re fast to have a good time the ‘liberty’ of residents of Ukraine, Hong Kong, or Xinjiang when the result advantages the geopolitical goals of indifferent technocrats hungry for world hegemony.

The second real self-organized labor actions come up demanding fundamental rights be acknowledged, then the masks come off and the fashion of tyrants present their true faces.”

Tyrants Are Displaying Their True Colours

As reported by Ehret, the Deep State of Canada is now utilizing the Emergency Measures Act to do exactly what Carney known as for, specifically establish and punish anybody who dares get up for freedom.

The Act grants extraordinary powers to the banking business to look folks’s social media accounts and personal financial institution data, and to grab the financial institution accounts of anybody suspected of supporting the Freedom Convoy, both in spirit or by way of on-line donations, together with cryptocurrencies.

Victims can have no recourse, because the banks have been given full authorized safety from lawsuits by these whose lives they destroy. Enterprise house owners in Canada who help freedom may have their insurance coverage insurance policies canceled, and truckers can lose their drivers’ licenses, both quickly or completely. 

Nonetheless, the protesters didn’t hand over. If something, the threats appeared to have had the alternative impact. In line with Ehret, the protestors had been “renewing their commitments to stay in place,” which they did till Trudeau despatched in police2 to arrest protestors and tow their vehicles.

Whereas Trudeau remained dictatorial till the truckers had been cleared from the Parliament space, the political institution, alternatively, confirmed indicators of cracking. Two Liberal Get together members, MP Joel Lightbound and MP Yves Robillard broke with occasion ranks, calling for an finish to the unpopular and pointless COVID measures.3 Then, lastly, in a shock turnabout, Trudeau buckled February 23, 2022, and mentioned he would revoke the Emergencies Act he’d invoked earlier.4

On a world scale, the silence of leaders of democracies and republics around the globe is as informative as Trudeau’s energy seize. By now, we might have anticipated leaders of the U.S., the U.Okay., France and any variety of others, to have stepped as much as the microphone to denounce the Canadian authorities’s actions.

However they have not, and that tells you all the things it’s essential find out about the place they stand on the problems of democracy and freedom. Worse, some have vocalized help for Trudeau’s dictatorial actions.

In a February 10, 2022, tweet, Juliette Kayyem, former assistant secretary of Homeland Safety beneath U.S. President Obama and a frequent CNN commentator, instructed the Canadian regime must slash the truckers’ tires, empty their gasoline tanks, arrest the drivers, transfer the vehicles, cancel their insurance coverage, droop their drivers’ licenses and prohibit their recertification sooner or later. In her personal phrases, “I can’t run out of how to make this damage.”5

The Phantasm of Liberal Democracy Has Collapsed

As famous by Ehret, whereas we do not but know the way it will finish, one factor we may be certain of is that “the phantasm of liberal democracy … has collapsed.”6 That does not imply the globalist cabal will pack up their briefcases and retire. No, they’ll battle to remain in energy till the bitter finish.

However the hill they’re standing on is getting steeper and slipperier by the day. Everybody can see that they are saying one factor and doing the exact opposite. You may’t lay declare to being a defender of democracy, freedom and equal rights for all whereas concurrently declaring peaceable residents the enemy of the state. It is simply not credible. As famous by traditionally left-leaning journalist Glenn Greenwald:7

“With regards to distant and adversarial international locations, we’re taught to acknowledge tyranny by way of using telltale ways of repression. Dissent from orthodoxies is censored.

Protests in opposition to the state are outlawed. Dissenters are harshly punished with no due course of. Lengthy jail phrases are doled out for political transgressions somewhat than crimes of violence. Journalists are handled as criminals and spies. Opposition to the insurance policies of political leaders are recast as crimes in opposition to the state.

When a authorities that’s hostile to the West engages in such conduct, it’s not simply simple however compulsory to malign it as despotic. Thus can one discover, on a nearly each day foundation, articles within the Western press citing the federal government’s use of these ways in Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela and no matter different international locations the West has an curiosity in disparaging …

That using these repressive ways render these international locations and their populations topic to autocratic regimes is taken into account undebatable. However when these weapons are wielded by Western governments, the exact reverse framework is imposed: describing them as despotic is now not compulsory however nearly prohibited.

That tyranny exists solely in Western adversaries however by no means within the West itself is handled as a everlasting axiom of worldwide affairs, as if Western democracies are divinely shielded from the temptations of real repression.

Certainly, to counsel {that a} Western democracy has descended to the identical stage of authoritarian repression because the West’s official enemies is to claim a proposition deemed intrinsically absurd and even vaguely treasonous.

The implicit guarantor of this comforting framework is democracy. Western international locations, in accordance with this mythology, can by no means be as repressive as their enemies as a result of Western governments are a minimum of elected democratically. This assurance, superficially interesting although it might be, utterly collapses with the slightest crucial scrutiny.”

The Risks of Majority Despotism

As defined by Greenwald, the premise of the U.S. Structure and the Invoice of Rights is that “majoritarian despotism is harmful within the excessive.” “Despotism” means authorities through which a single entity guidelines with absolute energy. Often, this entity is a person, however despotism may come up out of majority rule.

It is fascinating to notice that whereas the Founding Fathers most likely had no time period for what we now know because the psychology of “mass formation,” they had been clearly conscious of the risks posed by an irrational majority.

As famous by Greenwald, “the Invoice of Rights consists of little greater than limitations imposed on the tyrannical measures majorities may search to democratically enact.”

For instance, even when a majority of individuals agree that sure concepts and views must be criminalized, the Invoice of Rights prohibits it. The Invoice of Rights additionally prohibits the abolishment of spiritual freedom, even when a majority had been to help it. Likewise, “life and liberty can’t be disadvantaged with out due course of even when 9 out of 10 residents favor doing so.”

The Founding Fathers had been intelligent sufficient to understand that majority rule can simply develop into simply as destructively despotic as any dictatorship. Therefore, they ensured that particular person freedoms had been enshrined in such a manner that even should you’re the final individual within the nation who needs to observe faith, you’ve the correct to take action. The bulk can not take that away from you.

Waking As much as Actuality as It Is

Greenwald goes on to clarify how the indicators of tyranny within the West have been evident for properly over a decade. We simply weren’t paying consideration. Solely now, as we stare tyranny within the face first-hand, are we beginning to actually see it for what it’s:

“The last decade-long repression of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, standing alone, demonstrates how grave neoliberal assaults on dissent have develop into. Many are conscious of key components of this repression … however have forgotten or, as a consequence of media malfeasance, by no means knew a number of of probably the most excessive points.

Whereas the Obama DOJ beneath Lawyer Common Eric Holder failed to seek out proof of criminality after convening a years-long Grand Jury investigation, the then-Chairman of the Senate Homeland Safety Committee, Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), succeeded in pressuring monetary providers firms resembling MasterCard, Visa, PayPal and Financial institution of America to terminate WikiLeaks’ accounts and thus banish them from the monetary system, choking off their potential to obtain funds from supporters or pay their payments.

Lieberman and his neocon allies additionally pressured Amazon to take away WikiLeaks from its internet hosting providers, inflicting the whistleblower group to be quickly offline.

All of that succeeded in crippling WikiLeaks’ potential to function regardless of being charged with no crime: certainly, because the DOJ admitted, it couldn’t show that the group dedicated any crimes, but this extra-legal punishment was nonetheless meted out.

These ways pioneered in opposition to WikiLeaks — excluding dissenters from the monetary system and coercing tech firms to disclaim them web entry and not using a whiff of due course of — have now develop into customary weapons. Trudeau’s authorities seizes and freezes financial institution accounts with no judicial course of.

The ‘charity’ fundraising web site GoFundMe first blocked the tens of millions of {dollars} raised for the truckers and introduced it will redirect these funds to different charities, then refunded the donations when folks identified, rightly, that their authentic plan amounted to a type of stealing. When an alternate fundraising web site, GiveSendGo, raised tens of millions extra for the truckers, Canadian courts blocked its distribution.”

Greenwald additionally highlights how American politicians have pressured Massive Tech monopolies and the monetary system to behave as a joint censorship arm of presidency. Blocking folks and firms from with the ability to use servers and monetary transaction providers have been key methods to silence crucial voices.

Why Assange Was Focused

In line with Greenwald, Assange’s seize was precipitated by his denouncement of the Spanish authorities’s violence in opposition to residents of Catalonia in 2017 and 2019. Catalonia wished autonomy from the Madrid-based Spanish authorities, and the federal government responded with surprising drive.

“Spain handled the activists not as home protesters exercising their civic rights however as terrorists, seditionists and insurrectionists,” Greenwald writes. “Violence was used to brush up Catalans in mass arrests, and their leaders had been charged with terrorism and sedition and given prolonged jail sentences.”

Assange didn’t truly categorical help for Catalonian independence. He objected to the Spanish authorities’s violent assault on civil liberties. This was why Ecuador rescinded Assange’s asylum and handed him over to British authorities in April 2020. Since then, Assange has been held in a high-security jail in Belmarsh, though he is by no means been convicted of against the law.

“All of this displays, and stems from, a transparent and rising Western intolerance for dissent,” Greenwald writes.8 “This final decade of historical past is essential to know the dissent-eliminating framework that has been constructed and carried out within the West. This framework has culminated, to date, with the gorgeous multi-pronged assaults on Canadian truckers by the Trudeau authorities.

But it surely has been a very long time within the making, and it’s inevitable that it’s going to discover still-more excessive expressions. It’s, in spite of everything, primarily based within the central recognition that there’s mass, widespread anger and even hatred towards the neoliberal ruling class all through the West.”

Surveillance Equipment Was Created to Crush Dissent

In response to the rising anger in opposition to the ruling class, the technocratic cabal has “opted for drive, a system that crushes all types of dissent as quickly as they emerge in something resembling an efficient, significant or potent kind,” Greenwald notes.

A key a part of that dissent-crushing system is the surveillance equipment that has been erected throughout us.9 Whereas offered as a instrument to search out harmful criminals, we have come to understand that not often is the system ever used to go after true criminals. As an alternative, it is used to establish individuals who disagree with a given narrative. Its main function is to stifle dissent amongst residents.

As famous by the ACLU,10 whereas most Individuals suppose the Patriot Act’s surveillance powers are there to facilitate the identification and roundup of terrorists, it “truly turns common residents into suspects.” Dissent can be stifled by making use of prison phrases to those that disagree with the narrative. Living proof: “Anti-vaxxers” and anybody who disagrees with pandemic measures are actually labeled home terrorists or home extremists. As famous by Greenwald:

“Making use of phrases of criminality renders justifiable any subsequent acts of repression: we’re skilled to simply accept that core liberties are forfeited upon the fee of crimes. What’s most notable, although, is that this alleged criminality shouldn’t be adjudicated by way of judicial proceedings — with all of the accompanying protections of judges, juries, guidelines of proof and necessities of due course of — however just by decree …

Few issues are extra harmful than a political chief who convinces themselves that they’re so benevolent and well-intentioned that something they do is inherently justified in mild of their noble character and their enlightened ends …

Inside the logical world the place one is satisfied that they are surely combating a white nationalist, fascistic, insurrectionary world motion to overthrow liberal democracy, then all of the weapons we had been lengthy taught to view as despotic immediately develop into ennobled …

And it’s by way of this self-glorifying story which Western neoliberals are telling themselves that they’ve develop into precisely what they shrilly insist they’re battling.”

We Should Repeal the Patriot Act and Pandemic Powers

In September 2021, the White Home introduced a $65 billion biopreparedness initiative as a part of the Biden administration’s Construct Again Higher plan.11 As I’ve defined in lots of earlier articles, Construct Again Higher is a component and parcel of The Nice Reset, which in flip is a technocrat-led try to implement world authoritarianism. As reported by Biospace:12

“The primary aim is to rework medical protection, together with an enchancment and growth of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics in opposition to recognized threats, and lay the groundwork for unknown pathogens … Secondly, the plan requires guaranteeing ‘situational consciousness’ concerning infectious illness threats. This contains early warning and real-time monitoring of those viral threats.”

In a nutshell, what this biopreparedness initiative entails is extra invasive biosurveillance — that means, the monitoring of your inner biology. Proper now, claims that authorities needs to observe folks right down to their physique chemistry will earn you the title of paranoid conspiracy theorist, but the writing is on the wall. That is the place we’re headed, even when we’re not there but.

I consider the U.S. should repeal each the Patriot Act and the biopreparedness initiative, or else all privateness and freedom can be destroyed. 


Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *